<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omega Men&#8217;s Constellation Stainless Steel Bracelet Watch #1512.30.00</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-watches/omega-men-watches/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-watches/omega-men-watches/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00.html</link>
	<description>Cartier, Tag Heuer, Omega , Rolex Watches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:47:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Scott</title>
		<link>http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-watches/omega-men-watches/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00.html#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I bought this watch for my husband and it is just wonderful.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;It is sleek and beautiful.  So many men&#039;s watches are huge and clunky with too many dials or fancy doo-dads.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;This one is classic elegance, and very versital - Great to wear to the office or just bumming about :).  
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this watch for my husband and it is just wonderful.</p>
<p>It is sleek and beautiful.  So many men&#8217;s watches are huge and clunky with too many dials or fancy doo-dads.</p>
<p>This one is classic elegance, and very versital &#8211; Great to wear to the office or just bumming about <img src='http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .<br />
<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuxie's Mom</title>
		<link>http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-watches/omega-men-watches/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00.html#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuxie's Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>This Omega is classy but not flashy.  It&#039;s elegant but understated.  It fits well on a man who is not big or tall.  
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Omega is classy but not flashy.  It&#8217;s elegant but understated.  It fits well on a man who is not big or tall.<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Smith</title>
		<link>http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-watches/omega-men-watches/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00.html#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I have a much earlier version of this watch -- about 25 years earlier. So why am I writing this review? Simply put, when someone creates a truly classic, high quality design, it is timeless. After 25 years, this watch has never failed. The case and bracelet have their little scratches -- I just call that &quot;patina.&quot; Otherwise it looks good as new. Call this a &quot;long-term ownership&quot; review. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I do not know if the features of my watch are the same as the newer one, but here are my Pros and Cons: 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;PROS: 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;1. Timeless design as indicated above.
&lt;br /&gt;2. Reliability. 
&lt;br /&gt;3. The hour hand can be adjusted without disturbing the minute and second hands -- useful for traveling 
&lt;br /&gt;   and DST changes. (This is done via a three position stem.) 
&lt;br /&gt;4. As I recall, the time accuracy spec for my watch is +/- 10 seconds per year. Mine normally holds 7-10 
&lt;br /&gt;   seconds for the life of its battery which is about 2.5 years. 
&lt;br /&gt;5. It is thin enough to not interfere with cuffs on long sleeve shirts. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;CONS: 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;1. None. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;By the way, it is satisfying to see that the watch which listed at $600 when I bought it now lists for around $1700. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I would recommend this watch to anyone looking for one in this price range.  
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a much earlier version of this watch &#8212; about 25 years earlier. So why am I writing this review? Simply put, when someone creates a truly classic, high quality design, it is timeless. After 25 years, this watch has never failed. The case and bracelet have their little scratches &#8212; I just call that &#8220;patina.&#8221; Otherwise it looks good as new. Call this a &#8220;long-term ownership&#8221; review. </p>
<p>I do not know if the features of my watch are the same as the newer one, but here are my Pros and Cons: </p>
<p>PROS: </p>
<p>1. Timeless design as indicated above.<br />
<br />2. Reliability.<br />
<br />3. The hour hand can be adjusted without disturbing the minute and second hands &#8212; useful for traveling<br />
<br />   and DST changes. (This is done via a three position stem.)<br />
<br />4. As I recall, the time accuracy spec for my watch is +/- 10 seconds per year. Mine normally holds 7-10<br />
<br />   seconds for the life of its battery which is about 2.5 years.<br />
<br />5. It is thin enough to not interfere with cuffs on long sleeve shirts. </p>
<p>CONS: </p>
<p>1. None. </p>
<p>By the way, it is satisfying to see that the watch which listed at $600 when I bought it now lists for around $1700. </p>
<p>I would recommend this watch to anyone looking for one in this price range.<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Kreipe</title>
		<link>http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-watches/omega-men-watches/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00.html#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Kreipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebestsellingwatches.com/blog/omega-mens-constellation-stainless-steel-bracelet-watch-1512-30-00/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I bought my watch of this type 10 years ago.  I have very thin wrists, and the mid-size is just right.  Keeps great time, looks good with suits (10 years ago) and sports jackets/slacks in office today.  Several new batteries over the years, but no other maintenance.  It was a good investment 10 years ago, and I&#039;d paid about $1000 for it then.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my watch of this type 10 years ago.  I have very thin wrists, and the mid-size is just right.  Keeps great time, looks good with suits (10 years ago) and sports jackets/slacks in office today.  Several new batteries over the years, but no other maintenance.  It was a good investment 10 years ago, and I&#8217;d paid about $1000 for it then.</p>
<p>Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 3/5 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 580/580 objects using disk

Served from: thebestsellingwatches.com @ 2012-05-22 16:09:56 -->
